Review of the plot “Bioshock Infinite”

Sorry, but I won’t. I’m not interested in Kulakov’s opinion or someone else. On blogs, everyone writes something, and this is always evaluated in terms of quality. You wrote about the Sinatra – but I did not tell you “this is not relevant for 50 years as” I have put you plus. I liked what you did. Why games should be different? I don’t understand point blank.

If honestly, the plot is interesting, but does not contain anything special from an ideological point of view.

There were already so many analysis that the hand itself reaches for pistol Minusgan. But okay due to the fact that you are already on the minus, I will regret you.
P.S. Is the plot of the bio -shock so complicated? I had enough one evening to understand him.

Every time I read Russian blogs about games, with a retelling of the plot of Bioshock Infinite, my hand itself reaches for a pistol. No, this is not a culture, and not even a quote from Goebbels, rather a kind of aversion to people who are not able to figure out the subject, fall on the reader a stream of juggling and condemning.
First of all, every time the phrase “string theory” sounds, the authors for some reason think that this explains all. Say, Ken Levin came up with such a theory (yes, he himself came up with-Ken is such a universal physicist in a vacuum who himself invents theory), based on quantum physics, and she, this theory, still explains immediately in the game.

First, the author reads some left people https://noidverificationcasinos.co.uk/review/slottio/ who write about the theory of strings, although in the game I do not remember hints of strings theory, only on quantum mechanics. Then the author proves that the game has nothing to do with the theory of strings. This is a success, I can only envy! : D

two months later, at least kill, I see nothing outstanding in the game.Bad gameplay, the plot is revealed only in the finale, and before that it develops sluggishly. There is nothing deep. But the finale is amazing. But only.

I don’t understand that? If the review itself is shit, then it may be worth hinting to the author that it Inaccurate The review also drove out, because all this was already a week ago. And it’s not a fact that this should be done. But if the review is good, then what’s the difference when it is made?

This is a very specific game, all its perception depends on the perception of the world of the game. The game has magnificent characters, the design of the environment, a living world, a well -written scenario, but these things are perceived in different ways. Someone will be imbued with the world of the game and all the flaws will disappear, and for someone Infinite will remain an absolutely empty shooter (although I can’t understand that in the gameplay bad). It’s like a Cumberbatch face, someone sharp cheekbones, a high forehead, small eyes will seem attractive, and someone will celebrate it with a freak.

Do not be baptized, otherwise you will become sterile and you will go crazy with it and sleep your own daughter from an alternative measurement

I say that it is this plot, it is only in this game that does not represent anything outstanding. Only a powerful ending pulls it out

You know – I read it. Once upon a time, on one of the first acks. But even then I was outraged by the word “relevance”. In fact, I am against him and. In general, the article was addressed to those who would like to get into the authors of Stopgim? Here you can make increased demands on them, and let ordinary dudes write their reviews when they want. This is my position. Just if an article or video is high -quality – do not scold it for irrelevant. I meant that.

Yes, I won’t. Not mine. Utkina wanted to annoy. He defended him with foam at his mouth in one of the blogs, and he was here, that in the smoking room he just slipped a wagon of inadequate beliefs. I don’t know what to think now.

You do not remember where the post was about the failure of bio -shock plots? I just want to look at what arguments are there.

Lord people, what’s wrong with you? Why, in order to make a review, a person must first run to the store, then quickly quickly pass the game, like the last nerd, and then be sure to write the first? Is it not for the quality of the review we must follow? Gentlemen, ashamed, ashamed … and sad.